Showing posts with label Mikiverse Hip Hop. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mikiverse Hip Hop. Show all posts

Sunday, December 15, 2013

EAST INDIA COMPANY: THE ORIGINAL TOO-BIG-TO-FAIL FIRM

For an institution that has been defunct for almost 150 years, the East India Company still evokes powerful reactions across the world. 

Last year, when the Indian government debated allowing foreign companies to open supermarkets there, protesters shouted: “This is the return of the East India Company!” In the U.K., the East India Company’s extraordinary rise and fall have uncanny parallels with the stock-market bubbles and government bailouts that have shaken the economy over the past decade. 

And little wonder: At the heart of the company’s story are eternal questions about how to cope with the powers and perils of large multinational corporations.
Established by royal charter in 1600 with a monopoly on all trade with Asia, the East India Company had many incarnations in its almost 275-year run. 

For the first half of its existence, it remained a commercial supplicant, exporting bullion to pay for Asia’s luxury goods: first spices, then textiles and tea. Along the way, it became an early model for today’s joint-stock corporation and pioneered new management techniques for long- distance supply chains. 

It also created a series of lifestyle revolutions in 18th- century England. Daniel Defoe described in 1708 how the company’s calicoes, shipped from India, “crept into our houses, our closets, our bedchambers.” This calico boom prompted fierce resistance from Britain’s weavers, who felt threatened by a flood of cheap Asian imports. In 1720, the government responded with a ban on Indian calicoes, and it was behind this protectionist wall that the Industrial Revolution would take shape.

Asian Intrusions

One market may have closed, but the East India Company refocused its efforts on the growing demand for Chinese tea on both sides of the Atlantic. 

Meanwhile, at the company’s headquarters on Leadenhall Street in London, annual general meetings had become the arena for fearsome battles between management and shareholders and between rival management cliques. 

These boardroom fights intensified following the Battle of Plassey in June 1757, when the company used a combination of force and fraud to place a puppet on the throne of Bengal. The company then loaded the contents of the Bengal treasury onto a fleet of 100 boats and sent them downriver to its base in Calcutta. 

In one stroke, Robert Clive, who had engineered the victory, netted 2.5 million pounds for the company and 234,000 pounds for himself. (Today, this would be equivalent to a 262 million-pound corporate windfall and a cool 25 million-pound success fee for Clive.) The flow of wealth from Europe to Asia would now be reversed, and the East India Company’s shares soared on London’s markets. 

After the boom, however, came the bust. When drought struck Bengal in 1769, the company raised taxes and refused to intervene; contemporaries estimated that as many as 10 million people died in the resulting famine. Back in London, the East India Company’s shares slumped in response to the conflict in South India. This provoked a wider credit crisis, forcing the company’s directors to beg the government for a bailout in the summer of 1772. The East India Company’s centrality to Britain’s commercial and imperial ambitions meant that it was the original “too big to fail” corporation.

Tea Party

The British government tried to ensure that the East India Company would recover sufficiently to pay back its debts. One of the company’s assets was an immense amount of unsold tea. Instead of just importing the tea to Britain and then letting wholesalers ship it across the Atlantic, the company was granted the right to export the tea itself to Britain’s American colonies. 

The arrival of this controversial corporation inflamed a flagging protest against Britain’s taxes on tea. The result was the Boston Tea Party of December 1773. Here, Chinese tea bought with Bengali money by a British corporation was dumped in the sea by American patriots dressed as “Indians.” This was globalization 18th-century style. 

The East India Company’s fall from grace provided a compelling case study for Adam Smith in “The Wealth of Nations.” Smith argued that the impositions placed on European colonies, and the practices of monopoly corporations, had prevented the Age of Discovery from resulting in a generalized spread of commercial benefits. By the time he published the book’s third edition, Smith was even more convinced of “the Absurdity and hurtfulness of almost all our chartered companies.” And he added a new critique of the joint-stock model of ownership: “Negligence and profusion must always prevail, more or less, in the management of such a company,” he concluded. 

The revenue that tea provided enabled the East India Company to eventually recover. But this glamorous trade rested on a deadly secret: By the early 19th century, growth in the tea business was paid for by the mass smuggling of opium from the company’s Indian territories into China. And in India, the company had switched its attention from commerce to conquest, using its private army to take over the bulk of the subcontinent.

An Anachronism

In Britain, free-trade advocates inspired by Smith had won the removal of the company’s monopoly on trade with India in 1813 and with China in 1833. Increasingly an anachronism, the East India Company continued as the administrator of its conquests in India until its sepoys rebelled in 1857. 

John Stuart Mill, the company’s leading executive, defended his employer against ferocious attack in Parliament, but he couldn’t stop the inevitable. The company was stripped of its operational responsibilities, and the British Raj began.
If you go to the site of East India House today, you’ll find no plaque outside to mark that this was where the world’s most powerful corporation once dominated both trade and territories. With the global economy now reorienting toward Asia, understanding the East India Company’s extraordinary journey may be more important than ever if we want to understand the shocks that are still to come.
(Nick Robins is the author of “The Corporation that Changed the World: How the East India Company Shaped the Modern Multinational.” The opinions expressed are his own.) 

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-03-12/east-india-company-the-original-too-big-to-fail-firm.html


Tuesday, November 5, 2013

CBA MAKES $2.1 BILLION IN THREE MONTHS – THAT IS 700 MILLION A MONTH, EVERY MONTH

AAP
The Commonwealth Bank of Australian made a $2.1 billion cash profit in the three months to the end of September after lifting revenues and keeping costs under control.
The result follows a cash profit of $7.8 billion for the 12 months to June 30 this year.
CBA on Wednesday also reported an unaudited $2.1 billion net profit for the quarter.
The Commonwealth said a combination of solid revenue growth and cost discipline contributed to the quarterly result.
But the bank's group net interest margin fell during the quarter as a result of the lower interest rate environment.
Lower interest rates helped spur growth in business activity compared to a year ago, though total credit growth was modest due to higher levels of loan repayments.
The Commonwealth said household deposit growth was strong during the quarter while stock market gains had provided a boost for the bank's wealth management business.
Meanwhile, insurance premiums increased two per cent during the quarter.
ASB, the bank's New Zealand subsidiary, recorded solid growth in customer deposits and advances thanks to an improving economy, although lending margins remained under pressure.

http://au.finance.yahoo.com/news/cba-makes-2-1b-three-215909853.html


Friday, October 18, 2013

BRENDAN FEVOLA DECLARED BANKRUPT

October 2, 2013
Fallen AFL star Brendan Fevola. Fallen AFL star Brendan Fevola. Photo: Angela Wylie
Former AFL star Brendan Fevola has been declared bankrupt with more than $60,000 in unpaid debts.
The Federal Circuit Court in Brisbane heard the former Carlton and Brisbane player owes amounts of about $15,500, $45,500 and $7000 to three creditors.
A bankruptcy notice was served on him in May and he failed to comply, the court heard.
The former footballer was not in court on Wednesday.
Registrar Murray Belcher said he was satisfied the documents had been served on Fevola and the debt was still owing.
‘‘I am satisfied that the act of bankruptcy alleged ... has been committed by the respondent,’’ he said.
‘‘I see no reason not to make the order against the estate of Brendan Fevola.’’
He ordered the creditors’ costs be paid from Fevola’s estate.
It’s understood one of the matters involves a loan of about $7000 made to Fevola by builder Lou Menniti in 2011.

Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/brendan-fevola-declared-bankrupt-20131002-2uroi.html#ixzz2i8GR8zh7



Sunday, October 13, 2013

INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND: AUSSIE GROWTH SLUGGISH AFTER BOOM

Colin Brinsden AAP October 12, 2013 
AUSTRALIA-ECONOMY-RESOURCES-BOOM-FILES
The Australian economy remains sluggish.
THE International Monetary Fund (IMF) has confirmed it expects Australian economic growth to remain below trend this year and next, as the mining investment boom wanes.
But in a mixed assessment of Asia and the Pacific in its latest Regional Economic Outlook released in Washington on Friday, the IMF expects neighbouring New Zealand to gain a boost as its post-earthquake reconstruction is accelerated.
It has cut its economic growth forecast for the region to 5.1 per cent for 2013, down from a 5.7 per cent prediction made in April.
For 2014 growth is now seen at 5.3 per cent rather than six per cent.
It says activity among emerging economies in the region lost their impetus during the first six months of 2013.
"Tepid external demand from advanced economies and a slowdown in China dampened industrial activity throughout much of emerging Asia," it says.
At the same time, many of these economies have endured tighter financial conditions as a result of expectations that the US Federal Reserve will start winding back its monetary policy stimulus.
In India, one of Australia's major trading partners, the fallout from financial stress has likely left corporate and bank balance sheets vulnerable, leading to a further downward revision to growth forecasts that were already historically lower.
While China has been insulated from recent financial market vulnerability, the IMF expects continued measures to slow credit demand from the excesses of the past should put the economy on a slower trajectory.
The IMF has cut its growth forecasts for emerging Asia by 0.9 per cent since April for both 2013 and 2014 to 6.3 and 6.5 per cent respectively.
Among advanced countries in the region, an economic upswing in Japanese growth has been a "bright spot" and is starting to lift the country out of chronic deflation.
"In Australia, a slowdown in the resource investment boom will drag down growth but in New Zealand continued low interest rates and the acceleration of post-earthquake reconstruction will provide a boost to the economy," it said.
As in the World Economic Outlook released earlier this week, the IMF lowered its Australian forecasts to 2.5 per cent for this year and 2.8 per cent for the next, bringing it more into line with Australian Treasury and the Reserve Bank of Australia's forecasts.

http://www.news.com.au/national-news/international-monetary-fund-aussie-growth-sluggish-after-boom/story-fncynjr2-1226738673095


U.S. JUST DAYS AWAY FROM 'VERY DANGEROUS MOMENT'

REUTERS October 13, 2013
L
UK-IMF-FISCAL:U.S. just days away from very dangerous moment - World Bank
Reuters World Bank President Jim Yong Kim addresses the plenary session at the start of the annual IMF-World Bank fall meetings in Washington, October 11, 2013. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The president of the World Bank on Saturday warned the United States was just "days away" from causing a global economic disaster unless politicians come up with a plan to raise the nation's debt limit and avoid default.
"We're now five days away from a very dangerous moment. I urge U.S. policymakers to quickly come to a resolution before they reach the debt ceiling deadline...Inaction could result in interest rates rising, confidence falling and growth slowing," World Bank President Jim Yong Kim said in a briefing following a meeting of the bank's Development Committee.
"If this comes to pass, it could be a disastrous event for the developing world, and that will in turn greatly hurt developed economies as well," he said.
(Reporting by Anna Yukhananov and Lidia Kelly; Editing by Andrea Ricci)
 
http://au.news.yahoo.com/world/a/19369574/u-s-just-days-away-from-very-dangerous-moment-world-bank/



Saturday, September 28, 2013

HOW THE RESERVE BANK OF AUSTRALIA OUTSOURCES ITS ROLE TO FOREIGN PRIVATE BANKERS

Ann Pettifor 22 September 2011

The Reserve Bank of Australia (AFP: Torsten Blackwood) Ann Pettifor The tectonic plates of Australia's economy are shifting, as the mining boom generates the kind of ebullience common to all booms.
But cracks are appearing that could quickly overwhelm the gains made by the boom. These expose the Reserve Bank of Australia's flawed management of Australia's financial system.
It is worth reminding ourselves that the RBA's role (according to the 1959 Reserve Bank Act) is "to ensure that the monetary and banking policy of the Bank is directed to the greatest advantage of the people of Australia … to the maintenance of full employment … and the economic prosperity and welfare of the people..."
We need to bear that in mind in light of the RBA's recent policy stance. First the policy to set the highest official interest rate in the developed world. Second, the policy that permits the Australian dollar to rise to unsustainable levels. Third, the policy that allows Australia's banks to go abroad to raise funding in international capital markets.  
The RBA should fulfil its mandate by providing Australia's banks with finance - just as the US Fed and the Bank of England do. The process is a virtually costless way of injecting finance into the system, at very low rates of interest. However the RBA has chosen not to.
The cost of borrowing in foreign markets has risen recently because of the crisis in the eurozone. Australian banks' credit costs in international money markets have increased by more than 1.00 per cent in less than three months.1 In addition these banks face exchange rate risks - risks that could be avoided if the RBA was fulfilling its role.
But these are not the only risks posed by this policy. Foreign bankers lend to Australian banks by borrowing from their own central banks – at rates of 1 per cent or less. When they collect the prize of lending at 4.5 per cent, they do so by raiding the coffers of the RBA for hard currency. In other words, foreign private bankers are leaning on their taxpayer-backed central banks to make a quick and lucrative buck at the expense of Australians. The RBA turns a blind eye to this form of daylight robbery.
It gets worse. By borrowing in global capital markets, banks attract funds into Australia - $100 billion this year. These, added to inward investment flows into mining sectors, force up the exchange rate, the cost of Australian labour, products and services. Indeed there is a direct causal line between a very high rate of interest; banks borrowing abroad, the rise in the dollar, and the collapse of Bluescope Steel.
The ability of central banks to create cheap, but carefully regulated finance is intended to encourage and support sound private and public investment to guarantee the prosperity and welfare of Australians. The RBA has outsourced this role to foreign private banks.
Some might say that the big four Australian banks are very profitable indeed; that they survived the tsunami of the GFC – and that there is little to worry about.
Except that one small 'crack' has appeared in the system. International market players have taken out insurance against Australia's big four banks defaulting on their foreign loans – Credit Default Swaps (or CDSs). CDs's are 'premiums' taken out by speculators that do not own the underlying asset insured. (Something forbidden by regulators on normal insurance, because if we were allowed to take out insurance on another's asset e.g. property – the incentive to burn it down would be very great. But hey, this is the global financial system where anything goes.)
The 'premium' on the likelihood of the four Australian banks' defaulting has climbed by 50 per cent over August – indicating that speculators are losing confidence in these banks.
The noise around the mining boom means that this 'crack' appearing in the Australian economy is not audible to most. Nevertheless it poses a grave threat to Australians: one that the RBA would be wise to address before the onset of Credit Crunch 2.0.
1. Satjayit Das, author of Traders, Guns and Money in The Big Picture: From Green to Red - is Credit Crunch 2.0 imminent?
Ann Pettifor is a British Economist who co-founded the global Jubilee 2000 Campaign. She visited Australia last week on a speaking tour.

http://www.abc.net.au/unleashed/2911672.html 

 

Tuesday, September 3, 2013

WORLD BANK: MONEY LAUNDERING CRIMINALS | INTERVIEW WITH WHISTLEBLOWER KAREN HUDES


ETHICAL DONATORS AND COMMUNITY MEMBERS REQUIRED, TO FILL THIS SPACE WITH YOUR POLITICAL SLOGANS, ADVERTISING OFFERS, WEBSITE DETAILS, CHARITY REQUESTS, LECTURE OPPORTUNITIES, EDUCATIONAL WORKSHOPS, SPIRITUAL AND/ORHEALTH ENLIGHTENMENT COURSES.
AS AN IMPORTANT MEMBER OF THE GLOBAL INDEPENDENT MEDIA COMMUNITY, MIKIVERSE BANKS HONOURABLY REQUESTS YOUR HELP TO KEEP YOUR NEWS, DIVERSE,AND FREE OF CORPORATE, GOVERNMENT SPIN AND CONTROL. FOR MORE INFO ON HOW YOU MAY ASSIST, 
PLEASE CONTACT: themikiverse@gmail.com

Wednesday, August 28, 2013

RESERVE BANK OF INDIA STEPS IN AS RUPEE PLUNGES TO RECORD LOW

August 29, 2013
The Rupee against the US dollar since 2000.
The Rupee against the US dollar since 2000.
India's central bank will provide US dollars directly to state oil companies in its latest attempt to shore up a currency that has slumped to a record low, reflecting the stiff economic challenges facing the country in an uncertain global environment.
The Reserve Bank of India announced late on Wednesday a special window "with immediate effect" to sell US dollars through a designated bank to Indian Oil Corp, Hindustan Petroleum Corp, and Bharat Petroleum Corp "until further notice".
The RBI last opened such a window during the 2008 global financial crisis, although it had been widely expected to re-implement the measures after last month telling oil companies to buy US dollars from a single bank.
The steps are the latest in a series of extraordinary measures undertaken by the RBI to combat a currency fall of more than 20 per cent this year, by far the biggest decline among the Asian currencies tracked by Reuters.
State-run companies are the biggest source of US dollar demand in markets - worth $400 million to $500 million daily - and directing them to a special window is meant to reduce pressure on the rupee, which fell as much as 3.7 per cent to an all-time low of 68.85 on Wednesday, recording its biggest one-day fall in 18 years.
The higher cost of oil will make it even more difficult for the energy importer to contain their current account gaps.
"Syria is raising the level of uncertainty and those closest to Syria such as Turkey will be on the receiving end of the selling," said Ashok Shah, CIO of asset manager London & Capital. "It's another round of bad news."
"In (energy-importing) countries such as India, if you look at the oil price in rupees you can see how they are getting impacted - it's a double whammy for them."
Rupees traded in markets outside of India recovered after the measures, with one-month forward contracts dealt at 68.30 from levels of around 70 rupees before the announcement.
"Immediately it should help the spot market and improve sentiment," said A. Prasanna, an economist at ICICI Securities Primary Dealership in Mumbai.
"But then we have to see how global markets move because some of fall in the last few days is also because of global developments."
The rupee fell on Wednesday on worries that foreign investors will continue to sell out of a country in the midst of domestic woes and a global environment marked by fears of a possible US-led military strike against Syria and the looming end to the Federal Reserve's period of cheap money.
Officials familiar with RBI thinking told Reuters the US dollar sales for state-run oil companies would be offset by positions in forward markets.
That means that although the RBI would need to dip into its currency reserves, it had the prospect of replenishing the lost US dollars at a future date by redeeming the forward contracts from oil companies when the rupee stabilises.
The offsetting positions would essentially make these US dollar loans, designed to reduce concerns about reserves that at $279 billion, cover only about seven months of imports.
The action further cements the role the central bank is taking to combat the fall in the rupee, as the government has yet to unveil steps that can convince markets it can stabilise the rupee and attract foreign investment.
India badly needs this capital as it struggles with a record high current account deficit, growing fiscal pressures and an economy growing at the slowest in a decade.
Lacking confidence
The failure to address India's economic challenges is becoming an increasing source of tension at a time when rising domestic bond yields threaten to raise borrowing costs across the already slowing economy, while global prices of oil and gold - the country's two biggest imports - have surged this week.
Foreign investors have sold almost $1 billion of Indian shares in the eight sessions through Tuesday - a worrisome prospect given stocks had been India's one sturdy source of capital inflows with net purchases so far this year still totalling nearly $12 billion.
India's main National Stock Exchange index fell as much as 3.2 per cent on Wednesday, although suspected buying by state-run insurer Life Insurance Corporation - often the buyer of last resort - led the index to recover by the close.
In bond markets, foreign investors have sold more heavily, with outflows reaching nearly $4.6 billion so far this year.
"If steps are not taken to implement the reforms necessary to tackle the structural issues, the government will be left with the so-called "3D options": debt default, devaluation, deflation," said Angelo Corbetta, head of Asia equity for Pioneer Investments in London.
"In India, devaluation is happening now and deflation could be about to start. The good news is that the debt default is highly unlikely."
BNP Paribas on Wednesday slashed its economic growth forecast for India for the fiscal year to March 2014 to 3.7 per cent from its previous 5.2 per cent - the weakest growth since 1991-92 when India buckled under a balance of payments crisis that required a loan from the International Monetary Fund.
"India's parliament remains toxically dysfunctional with little, if any, business conducted," BNP said.
"And, with next year's general election looming ever nearer, the government's willingness to instigate a politically unpopular fiscal tightening is close to nil."
The government has tried but failed to provide a coherent response, analysts said.
Its approval of infrastructure projects on Tuesday was trumped by concerns about the fiscal deficit after the lower house of parliament this week approved a 1.35 trillion rupee ($19.6 billion) plan to provide cheap grain to the poor.
India is due to post April-June gross domestic product data on Friday, with analysts estimating the economy grew at an annual rate of 4.7 per cent, roughly in line with the previous quarter. It will also post July federal fiscal deficit figures.
ETHICAL DONATORS AND COMMUNITY MEMBERS REQUIRED, TO FILL THIS SPACE WITH YOUR POLITICAL SLOGANS, ADVERTISING OFFERS, WEBSITE DETAILS, CHARITY REQUESTS, LECTURE OPPORTUNITIES, EDUCATIONAL WORKSHOPS, SPIRITUAL AND/ORHEALTH ENLIGHTENMENT COURSES.
AS AN IMPORTANT MEMBER OF THE GLOBAL INDEPENDENT MEDIA COMMUNITY, MIKIVERSE BANKS HONOURABLY REQUESTS YOUR HELP TO KEEP YOUR NEWS, DIVERSE,AND FREE OF CORPORATE, GOVERNMENT SPIN AND CONTROL. FOR MORE INFO ON HOW YOU MAY ASSIST, 
PLEASE CONTACT: themikiverse@gmail.com

Monday, August 12, 2013

YOUR MORTGAGE DOCUMENTS ARE FAKE!

Prepare to be outraged. Newly obtained filings from this Florida woman's lawsuit uncover horrifying scheme (Update)

Your mortgage documents are fake!
Lynn Szymoniak (Credit: CBS News/60 MInutes)
If you know about foreclosure fraud, the mass fabrication of mortgage documents in state courts by banks attempting to foreclose on homeowners, you may have one nagging question: Why did banks have to resort to this illegal scheme? Was it just cheaper to mock up the documents than to provide the real ones? Did banks figure they simply had enough power over regulators, politicians and the courts to get away with it? (They were probably right about that one.)
A newly unsealed lawsuit, which banks settled in 2012 for $95 million, actually offers a different reason, providing a key answer to one of the persistent riddles of the financial crisis and its aftermath. The lawsuit states that banks resorted to fake documents because they could not legally establish true ownership of the loans when trying to foreclose.
This reality, which banks did not contest but instead settled out of court, means that tens of millions of mortgages in America still lack a legitimate chain of ownership, with implications far into the future. And if Congress, supported by the Obama administration, goes back to the same housing finance system, with the same corrupt private entities who broke the nation’s private property system back in business packaging mortgages, then shame on all of us.
The 2011 lawsuit was filed in U.S. District Court in both North and South Carolina, by a white-collar fraud specialist named Lynn Szymoniak, on behalf of the federal government, 17 states and three cities. Twenty-eight banks, mortgage servicers and document processing companies are named in the lawsuit, including mega-banks like JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, Citi and Bank of America.
Szymoniak, who fell into foreclosure herself in 2009, researched her own mortgage documents and found massive fraud (for example, one document claimed that Deutsche Bank, listed as the owner of her mortgage, acquired ownership in October 2008, four months after they first filed for foreclosure). She eventually examined tens of thousands of documents, enough to piece together the entire scheme.
A mortgage has two parts: the promissory note (the IOU from the borrower to the lender) and the mortgage, which creates the lien on the home in case of default. During the housing bubble, banks bought loans from originators, and then (in a process known as securitization) enacted a series of transactions that would eventually pool thousands of mortgages into bonds, sold all over the world to public pension funds, state and municipal governments and other investors. A trustee would pool the loans and sell the securities to investors, and the investors would get an annual percentage yield on their money.


In order for the securitization to work, banks purchasing the mortgages had to physically convey the promissory note and the mortgage into the trust. The note had to be endorsed (the way an individual would endorse a check), and handed over to a document custodian for the trust, with a “mortgage assignment” confirming the transfer of ownership. And this had to be done before a 90-day cutoff date, with no grace period beyond that.
Georgetown Law professor Adam Levitin spelled this out in testimony before Congress in 2010: “If mortgages were not properly transferred in the securitization process, then mortgage-backed securities would in fact not be backed by any mortgages whatsoever.”
The lawsuit alleges that these notes, as well as the mortgage assignments, were “never delivered to the mortgage-backed securities trusts,” and that the trustees lied to the SEC and investors about this. As a result, the trusts could not establish ownership of the loan when they went to foreclose, forcing the production of a stream of false documents, signed by “robo-signers,” employees using a bevy of corporate titles for companies that never employed them, to sign documents about which they had little or no knowledge.
Many documents were forged (the suit provides evidence of the signature of one robo-signer, Linda Green, written eight different ways), some were signed by “officers” of companies that went bankrupt years earlier, and dozens of assignments listed as the owner of the loan “Bogus Assignee for Intervening Assignments,” clearly a template that was never changed. One defendant in the case, Lender Processing Services, created masses of false documents on behalf of the banks, often using fake corporate officer titles and forged signatures. This was all done to establish standing to foreclose in courts, which the banks otherwise could not.
Szymoniak stated in her lawsuit that, “Defendants used fraudulent mortgage assignments to conceal that over 1400 MBS trusts, each with mortgages valued at over $1 billion, are missing critical documents,” meaning that at least $1.4 trillion in mortgage-backed securities are, in fact, non-mortgage-backed securities. Because of the strict laws governing of these kinds of securitizations, there’s no way to make the assignments after the fact. Activists have a name for this: “securitization FAIL.”
One smoking gun piece of evidence in the lawsuit concerns a mortgage assignment dated Feb. 9, 2009, after the foreclosure of the mortgage in question was completed. According to the suit, “A typewritten note on the right hand side of the document states:  ‘This Assignment of Mortgage was inadvertently not recorded prior to the Final Judgment of Foreclosure… but is now being recorded to clear title.’”
This admission confirms that the mortgage assignment was not made before the closing date of the trust, invalidating ownership. The suit further argued that “the act of fabricating the assignments is evidence that the MBS Trust did not own the notes and/or the mortgage liens for some assets claimed to be in the pool.”
The federal government, states and cities joined the lawsuit under 25 counts of the federal False Claims Act and state-based versions of the law. All of them bought mortgage-backed securities from banks that never conveyed the mortgages or notes to the trusts. The plaintiffs argued that, considering that trustees and servicers had to spend lots of money forging and fabricating documents to establish ownership, they were materially harmed by the subsequent impaired value of the securities. Also, these investors (which includes the Treasury Department and the Federal Reserve) paid for the transfer of mortgages to the trusts, yet they were never actually transferred.
Finally, the lawsuit argues that the federal government was harmed by “payments made on mortgage guarantees to Defendants lacking valid notes and assignments of mortgages who were not entitled to demand or receive said payments.”
Despite Szymoniak seeking a trial by jury, the government intervened in the case, and settled part of it at the beginning of 2012, extracting $95 million from the five biggest banks in the suit (Wells Fargo, Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, Citi and GMAC/Ally Bank). Szymoniak herself was awarded $18 million. But the underlying evidence was never revealed until the case was unsealed last Thursday.
Now that it’s unsealed, Szymoniak, as the named plaintiff, can go forward and prove the case. Along with her legal team (which includes the law firm of Grant & Eisenhoffer, which has recovered more money under the False Claims Act than any firm in the country), Szymoniak can pursue discovery and go to trial against the rest of the named defendants, including HSBC, the Bank of New York Mellon, Deutsche Bank and US Bank.
The expenses of the case, previously borne by the government, now are borne by Szymoniak and her team, but the percentages of recovery funds are also higher. “I’m really glad I was part of collecting this money for the government, and I’m looking forward to going through discovery and collecting the rest of it,” Szymoniak told Salon.
It’s good that the case remains active, because the $95 million settlement was a pittance compared to the enormity of the crime. By the end of 2009, private mortgage-backed securities trusts held one-third of all residential mortgages in the U.S. That means that tens of millions of home mortgages worth trillions of dollars have no legitimate underlying owner that can establish the right to foreclose. This hasn’t stopped banks from foreclosing anyway with false documents, and they are often successful, a testament to the breakdown of law in the judicial system. But to this day, the resulting chaos in disentangling ownership harms homeowners trying to sell these properties, as well as those trying to purchase them. And it renders some properties impossible to sell.
To this day, banks foreclose on borrowers using fraudulent mortgage assignments, a legacy of failing to prosecute this conduct and instead letting banks pay a fine to settle it. This disappoints Szymoniak, who told Salon the owner of these loans is now essentially “whoever lies the most convincingly and whoever gets the benefit of doubt from the judge.” Szymoniak used her share of the settlement to start the Housing Justice Foundation, a non-profit that attempts to raise awareness of the continuing corruption of the nation’s courts and land title system.
Most of official Washington, including President Obama, wants to wind down mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and return to a system where private lenders create securitization trusts, packaging pools of loans and selling them to investors. Government would provide a limited guarantee to investors against catastrophic losses, but the private banks would make the securities, to generate more capital for home loans and expand homeownership.
That’s despite the evidence we now have that, the last time banks tried this, they ignored the law, failed to convey the mortgages and notes to the trusts, and ripped off investors trying to cover their tracks, to say nothing of how they violated the due process rights of homeowners and stole their homes with fake documents.
The very same banks that created this criminal enterprise and legal quagmire would be in control again. Why should we view this in any way as a sound public policy, instead of a ticking time bomb that could once again throw the private property system, a bulwark of capitalism and indeed civilization itself, into utter disarray? As Lynn Szymoniak puts it, “The President’s calling for private equity to return. Why would we return to this?”
Update: This story previously suggested that banks settled this lawsuit with the federal government for $1 billion. That number is actually the total for a number of whistle-blower lawsuits that were folded into a larger National Mortgage Settlement. This specific lawsuit settled for $95 million. The post above has been changed to reflect this fact.
http://www.salon.com/2013/08/12/your_mortgage_documents_are_fake/
ETHICAL DONATORS AND COMMUNITY MEMBERS REQUIRED, TO FILL THIS SPACE WITH YOUR POLITICAL SLOGANS, ADVERTISING OFFERS, WEBSITE DETAILS, CHARITY REQUESTS, LECTURE OPPORTUNITIES, EDUCATIONAL WORKSHOPS, SPIRITUAL AND/ORHEALTH ENLIGHTENMENT COURSES.
AS AN IMPORTANT MEMBER OF THE GLOBAL INDEPENDENT MEDIA COMMUNITY, MIKIVERSE BANKS HONOURABLY REQUESTS YOUR HELP TO KEEP YOUR NEWS, DIVERSE,AND FREE OF CORPORATE, GOVERNMENT SPIN AND CONTROL. FOR MORE INFO ON HOW YOU MAY ASSIST, PLEASE CONTACT: themikiverse@gmail.com

Friday, August 9, 2013

JUDGE BACKS CUSTOMER'S CREDIT CARD SCAM

August 9, 2013
Mr Argarkov's version of the contract contained a zero per cent interest rate, no fees and no credit limit. Every time the bank failed to comply with the rules, he would fine them 3 million roubles. Mr Argarkov's version of the contract contained a zero per cent interest rate, no fees and no credit limit. Every time the bank failed to comply with the rules, he would fine them 3 million roubles. Photo: Karl Hilzinger
It has to be the best credit card scam ever - and it worked.
When Dmitry Argarkov was sent a letter offering him a credit card, he found the rates not to his liking.
But he didn't throw the contract away or shred it. Instead, the 42-year-old from Voronezh, Russia, scanned it into his computer, altered the terms and sent it back to Tinkoff Credit Systems.
Mr Argarkov's version of the contract contained a zero per cent interest rate, no fees and no credit limit. Every time the bank failed to comply with the rules, he would fine them 3 million roubles ($A100,000). If Tinkoff tried to cancel the contract, it would have to pay him 6 million roubles.
Tinkoff apparently failed to read the amendments, signed the contract and sent Mr Argakov a credit card.
"The Bank confirmed its agreement to the client's terms and sent him a credit card and a copy of the approved application form," his lawyer Dmitry Mikhalevich told the Kommersant newspaper.
"The opened credit line was unlimited. He could afford to buy an island somewhere in Malaysia, and the bank would have to pay for it by law."
However, Tinkoff attempted to close the account due to overdue payments.
It sued Mr Argakov for 45,000 roubles for fees and charges that were not in his altered version of the contract. This week a Russian judge ruled in Mr Argakov's favour.
Tinkoff had signed the contract and was legally bound to it. Mr Argakov was only ordered to pay an outstanding balance of 19,000 roubles ($A641).
"They signed the documents without looking. They said what usually their borrowers say in court: 'We have not read it'," said Mr Mikhalevich.
But now Mr Argakov has taken matters one step further. He is suing Tinkoff for 24 million roubles for not honouring the contract and breaking the agreement.
Tinkoff has launched its own legal action, accusing Mr Argakov of fraud.
Oleg Tinkov, founder of the bank, tweeted: "Our lawyers think he is going to get not 24m, but really 4 years in prison for fraud. Now it's a matter of principle for @tcsbanktwitter."
The court will review Mr Argakov's case next month.
Daily Telegraph, London

http://www.theage.com.au/money/borrowing/judge-backs-customers-credit-card-scam-20130809-2rlh4.html


ETHICAL DONATORS AND COMMUNITY MEMBERS REQUIRED, TO FILL THIS SPACE WITH YOUR POLITICAL SLOGANS, ADVERTISING OFFERS, WEBSITE DETAILS, CHARITY REQUESTS, LECTURE OPPORTUNITIES, EDUCATIONAL WORKSHOPS, SPIRITUAL AND/ORHEALTH ENLIGHTENMENT COURSES.
AS AN IMPORTANT MEMBER OF THE GLOBAL INDEPENDENT MEDIA COMMUNITY, MIKIVERSE BANKS HONOURABLY REQUESTS YOUR HELP TO KEEP YOUR NEWS, DIVERSE,AND FREE OF CORPORATE, GOVERNMENT SPIN AND CONTROL. FOR MORE INFO ON HOW YOU MAY ASSIST, PLEASE CONTACT: themikiverse@gmail.com

Wednesday, August 7, 2013

THE AMERICAN DREAM FILM-FULL LENGTH


ETHICAL DONATORS AND COMMUNITY MEMBERS REQUIRED, TO FILL THIS SPACE WITH YOUR POLITICAL SLOGANS, ADVERTISING OFFERS, WEBSITE DETAILS, CHARITY REQUESTS, LECTURE OPPORTUNITIES, EDUCATIONAL WORKSHOPS, SPIRITUAL AND/ORHEALTH ENLIGHTENMENT COURSES.
AS AN IMPORTANT MEMBER OF THE GLOBAL INDEPENDENT MEDIA COMMUNITY, MIKIVERSE BANKS HONOURABLY REQUESTS YOUR HELP TO KEEP YOUR NEWS, DIVERSE,AND FREE OF CORPORATE, GOVERNMENT SPIN AND CONTROL. FOR MORE INFO ON HOW YOU MAY ASSIST, PLEASE CONTACT: themikiverse@gmail.com

Monday, August 5, 2013

HOPE FOR MORTGAGE 'VICTIMS' WITH HOMEOWNERS WINNING BATTLE AGAINST BANKS

Anthony Klan From: The Australian June 04, 2012
Jill and John O'Donnell
Jill and John O'Donnell were able to keep their family home at Freshwater, Sydney, thanks to a Supreme Court ruling that cut their mortgage by 75 per cent. Picture: Alan Pryke Source: The Australian
THOUSANDS of struggling homeowners could walk away from their mortgages as a series of court cases helps to expose widespread improper lending practices involving some of the nation's biggest financial institutions.
Finance industry giants are spending millions of dollars on legal fees fighting homeowners who have successfully exited their mortgages because they were stung by sub-prime-style lending practices during the last property boom. An investigation by The Australian has revealed several mortgage providers and mortgage brokers engaged in improper lending practices in the years before the global financial crisis hit in 2008, including inflating borrowers' income and ability to repay debts to secure so-called "low-doc" loans.
Courts in several states have sided with homeowners who have defaulted on their loans, extinguishing their mortgages. The rulings have encouraged other lenders to reach settlements with borrowers that are saving homeowners hundreds of thousands of dollars. And the issue could be tested in the High Court in coming months.
Award-winning consumer advocate Denise Brailey, who runs the Banking and Finance Consumers Support Association, said she was dealing with more than 100 alleged victims of improper lending. "What this means is that if you are a struggling homeowner and the bank comes knocking you may well not have to hand over your keys," Ms Brailey said.
The declining health of loans could have ramifications for the federal government, which has put about $14 billion into securitised mortgage investments - packages of home loans known as "residential mortgage backed securities" - since the GFC.
In October 2008, Wayne Swan announced the government would invest $4bn to shore up the RMBS market, but that figure has ballooned and in April last year he increased the obligation to $20bn.
Australian Office of Financial Management chief executive Rob Nicholl said the government had invested in superior-quality loans with relatively low defaults rates and that it was "very cognisant of all the risks involved".
However, default rates among some mortgage securities, which include low-doc loans, have surged to as much as 7 per cent of loans.
According to Fitch Ratings, low-doc loans comprise about 8-10 per cent of every mortgage in the Australian securitised mortgage market.
Fitch analyst James Zanesi said that proportion of low-doc loans was similar in the wider, $1.2 trillion Australian mortgage market.
According to Fitch, low-doc loans were more than four times as likely to be in default than standard loans, with 5.5 per cent of all "prime" low-doc loans in default compared with 1.26 per cent of all standard loans.
The group said low-doc loans were experiencing "considerable deterioration" and there was "no relief in sight" for low-doc loan delinquencies.
The Australian has amassed evidence of widespread improper lending activity based around abuse of low-documentation lending products.
In the race to provide credit - and earn commissions - major lenders such as Macquarie, Suncorp and GE Money spruiked imprudent lending practices to mortgage brokers, highlighting loopholes in their own lending requirements.
Low-doc or "no-doc" loans were supposed to be only for self-employed business owners who could not provide standard loan information. Borrowers typically pay a higher interest rate to reflect their lack of a regular credit and income history.
But in scores of emails those lenders - and many others - told mortgage brokers that borrowers needed only to register an Australian Business Number "for one day" to secure low-doc or no-doc loans.
One email from a Macquarie Bank business development manager to brokers says: "Why not try Macquarie for the below reasons . . . No docs - Client only needs to be self-employed for 1 day or more . . . No assets and liabilities required, no income needs to be stated!!!"
Macquarie Bank and GE Money declined to comment. Suncorp spokesman Jamin Smith defended similar emails sent by Suncorp staff, saying business development managers did not have the power to authorise loans.
The Australian has also discovered cases of mortgage brokers, loan originators and others inflating borrowers' stated incomes on loan application forms without their knowledge.
Precedent-setting court cases have recently found that, where borrowers were given loans they could never afford, lenders must extinguish part or all of those mortgages. Nine judges before six courts have to date found in favour of homeowners affected by improper loan applications, and in almost all cases courts have ordered lenders to fully extinguish mortgages within 30 days.
The most clear-cut cases have occurred in NSW because of the 1980 Contracts Review Act in that state. However, courts in Victoria and Western Australia have found in favour of borrowers under existing legislation. Major mortgage securitiser First Mac - which has issued $9.5bn in Australian mortgages since 2003 - lost a NSW Supreme Court bid to repossess the family homes of three borrowers on the grounds those borrowers were victims of loan application schemes.
The judges found lenders had acted inappropriately by engaging in "asset lending" - that is, lending money based solely on the fact that the loan is secured by an asset, usually a person's home, and paying little or no regard as to whether the borrower could afford the loan.
First Mac appealed against the decision and in December the judges again sided with borrowers, ordering that mortgages against two family homes be rescinded completely, and reduced by three-quarters in a third case. First Mac was ordered to pay court costs.
In light of those judgments, lenders such as Westpac are scrambling to settle with borrowers who claim to have been wronged. In many cases, hundreds of thousands of dollars are being wiped from mortgages.
In every court case heard, lenders had failed to make simple checks, such as calling prospective borrowers to verify their stated incomes or employment status.
First Mac, based in Brisbane, has now sought to take its case to the High Court, and a hearing as to whether the case will be heard will take place later this month.
A High Court spokesman said between 8 per cent and 10 per cent of applications for such "special leave to appeal" applications were granted.
First Mac founder and managing director Kim Cannon did not respond to calls last week.
In most instances, the precedent-setting cases against the deep-pocketed financial institutions are being funded by consumer groups or lawyers working for little or no pay because the borrower victims are often close to bankruptcy. Lawyers said the vast majority of the thousands of homeowners affected by improper or unconscionable lending activities had no idea they could legally walk away from their mortgages.
"Lenders have been throwing everything they have at these cases because they know there are thousands, probably tens of thousands, of people who have been affected," said Geoff Roberson of Champion Legal, who has run the cases against First Mac. "The problem for many borrowers is they don't know they have been wronged and simply roll over when the banks come knocking."
Consumer advocates said borrowers who believed they had been affected should approach their lender for a copy of their loan application form, which they were entitled to by law, and check the income levels stated.
Ms Brailey said not being provided with a copy of the loan application form was a key indicator borrowers may have been subject to loan application irregularities.
"In every single case of the 100-plus I am dealing with, the person has not been provided with a copy of their loan application form by their mortgage broker or lender," she said.
She said borrowers were entitled to such information by law. However, banks and other lenders had "stonewalled" such requests.
"Every time the borrowers receive the forms they are blown away," Ms Brailey said. "Incomes have been grossly exaggerated, false employment job descriptions have been entered or they have been stated as being employed when they're not.
"In one case, a lowly-paid deckhand was described as a ship's captain and described as earning $150,000 a year."
Ms Brailey, who has been tracking low-doc loans and loan application issues with The Australian for several years, said she had uncovered examples of loan application irregularities in loans approved by 14 banks and other lenders.
She obtained emails illustrating imprudent lending practices by 36 banks and non-bank lenders, including all of the major banks.
"We're about to see a major train wreck," she said.
investigations@theaustralian.com.au
ETHICAL DONATORS AND COMMUNITY MEMBERS REQUIRED, TO FILL THIS SPACE WITH YOUR POLITICAL SLOGANS, ADVERTISING OFFERS, WEBSITE DETAILS, CHARITY REQUESTS, LECTURE OPPORTUNITIES, EDUCATIONAL WORKSHOPS, SPIRITUAL AND/ORHEALTH ENLIGHTENMENT COURSES.
AS AN IMPORTANT MEMBER OF THE GLOBAL INDEPENDENT MEDIA COMMUNITY, MIKIVERSE BANKS HONOURABLY REQUESTS YOUR HELP TO KEEP YOUR NEWS, DIVERSE,AND FREE OF CORPORATE, GOVERNMENT SPIN AND CONTROL. FOR MORE INFO ON HOW YOU MAY ASSIST, PLEASE CONTACT: themikiverse@gmail.com
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/investigations/hope-for-mortgage-victims-as-homeowners-winning-battle-against-banks/story-fn6tcs23-1226382076020

Tuesday, July 23, 2013

ONE HUNDRED MILLION DOLLAR PENNY


ETHICAL DONATORS AND COMMUNITY MEMBERS REQUIRED, TO FILL THIS SPACE WITH YOUR POLITICAL SLOGANS, ADVERTISING OFFERS, WEBSITE DETAILS, CHARITY REQUESTS, LECTURE OPPORTUNITIES, EDUCATIONAL WORKSHOPS, SPIRITUAL AND/OR HEALTH ENLIGHTENMENT COURSES.
AS AN IMPORTANT MEMBER OF THE GLOBAL INDEPENDENT MEDIA COMMUNITY, MIKIVERSE BANKS HONOURABLY REQUESTS YOUR HELP TO KEEP YOUR NEWS, DIVERSE,AND FREE OF CORPORATE, GOVERNMENT SPIN AND CONTROL. FOR MORE INFORMATION ON HOW YOU MAY ASSIST, PLEASE CONTACT: themikiverse@gmail.com
 

Wednesday, July 10, 2013

BAIN CAPITAL

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Bain Capital LLCD
Type Private, LLC
Industry Private equity
Founded 1984
Founder(s) Bill Bain[1]
Mitt Romney
T. Coleman Andrews III
Eric Kriss
John Halpern
Headquarters 200 Clarendon Street
Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.
Number of locations Boston, Chicago, New York, Palo Alto, London, Luxembourg, Munich, Hong Kong, Shanghai, Mumbai, and Tokyo
Key people Joshua Bekenstein, John Connaughton, Paul Edgerley, Mark Nunnelly, Stephen Pagliuca, Jordan Hitch, Matthew Levin
Products Venture capital, investment management, public equity, high-yield assets, Mezzanine capital, leveraged buyouts and growth capital
Total assets Increase US$ 66 billion (2012)
Employees 400+ (2012)[2]
Website www.baincapital.com

In late 2011, Bain Capital moved its headquarters to the John Hancock Tower in Boston, Massachusetts. Bain occupies 210,000 sq. ft. from the 36th to 43rd floors.[3]
Bain Capital is an American alternative asset management and financial services company based in Boston, Massachusetts. It specializes in private equity, venture capital, credit and public market investments. Bain invests across a broad range of industry sectors and geographic regions. As of early 2012, the firm managed approximately $66 billion of investor capital across its various investment platforms.
The firm was founded in 1984 by partners from the consulting firm Bain & Company. Since inception it has invested in or acquired hundreds of companies including AMC Entertainment, Aspen Education Group, Brookstone, Burger King, Burlington Coat Factory, Clear Channel Communications, Domino's Pizza, DoubleClick, Dunkin' Donuts, D&M Holdings, Guitar Center, Hospital Corporation of America (HCA), Sealy, The Sports Authority, Staples, Toys "R" Us, Warner Music Group and The Weather Channel.
As of the end of 2011, Bain Capital had approximately 400 professionals, most with previous experience in consulting, operations or finance.[2] Bain is headquartered at the John Hancock Tower in Boston, Massachusetts with additional offices in New York City, Chicago, Palo Alto, London, Luxembourg, Munich, Hong Kong, Shanghai, Mumbai, and Tokyo.
The company, and its actions during its first 15 years, became the subject of political and media scrutiny as a result of co-founder Mitt Romney's later political career, especially his 2012 presidential campaign.[4][5]

Contents

History

1984 founding and early history

Bain Capital was founded in 1984 by Bain & Company partners Mitt Romney, T. Coleman Andrews III, and Eric Kriss, after Bill Bain had offered Romney the chance to head a new venture that would invest in companies and apply Bain's consulting techniques to improve operations.[6] In addition to the three founding partners, the early team included Fraser Bullock, Robert F. White, Joshua Bekenstein, Adam Kirsch, and Geoffrey S. Rehnert.[7] Romney initially had the titles of president[8] and managing general partner[9][10] or managing partner.[11] He later became referred to as managing director[12] or CEO[13] as well. He was also the sole shareholder of the firm.[14] At the beginning, the firm had fewer than ten employees.[15] When new employees were hired, they were generally in their twenties and top-ranked graduates from Stanford University or Harvard University, both of which Romney had attended.[16]
In the face of skepticism from potential investors, Romney and his partners spent a year raising the $37 million in funds needed to start the new operation.[15][17][18][19] Bain partners put in $12 million of their own money and sourced the rest from wealthy individuals.[20] Early investors included Boston real estate mogul Mortimer Zuckerman and Robert Kraft, the owner of the New England Patriots football team.[18] They also included members of elite Salvadoran families who fled the country's civil war.[21] They and other wealthy Latin Americans invested $9 million primarily through offshore companies registered in Panama.[20]
While Bain Capital was founded by Bain executives, the firm was not an affiliate or a division of Bain & Company but rather a completely separate company. Initially, the two firms shared the same offices - in an office tower at Copley Place in Boston[22] - and a similar approach to improving business operations. However, the two firms had put in place certain protections to avoid sharing information between the two companies and the Bain & Company executives had the ability to veto investments that posed potential conflicts of interest.[23] Bain Capital also provided an investment opportunity for partners of Bain & Company. The firm initially gave a cut of its profits to Bain & Company, but Romney later persuaded Bill Bain to give that up.[24]

Bain Capital was an initial investor in Staples, Inc.
The Bain Capital team was initially reluctant to invest its capital. By 1985, things were going poorly enough that Romney considered closing the operation, returning investors' money back to them, and having the partners go back to their old positions.[25] The partners saw weak spots in so many potential deals that by 1986, very few had been done.[26] At first, Bain Capital focused on venture capital opportunities.[26] One of Bain's earliest and most notable venture investments was in Staples, Inc., the office supply retailer. In 1986, Bain provided $4.5 million to two supermarket executives, Leo Kahn and Thomas G. Stemberg, to open an office supply supermarket in Brighton, Massachusetts.[27] The fast-growing retail chain went public in 1989;[28] by 1996, the company had grown to over 1,100 stores,[29] and as of fiscal year end January 2012, Staples reached over $20 billion in sales, nearly $1.0B in net income, 87,000 employees, and 2,295 stores.[30] Bain Capital eventually reaped a nearly sevenfold return on its investment, and Romney sat on the Staples board of directors for over a decade.[15][19][26] Another very successful investment occurred in 1986 when $1 million was invested in medical equipment maker Calumet Coach, which eventually returned $34 million.[31] A few years later, Bain Capital made an investment in the technology research outfit the Gartner Group, which ended up returning a 16-fold gain.[31]
Bain invested the $37 million of capital in its first fund in twenty companies and by 1989 was generating an annualized return in excess of 50 percent. By the end of the decade, Bain's second fund, raised in 1987 had deployed $106 million into 13 investments.[32] As the firm began organizing around funds, each such fund was run by a specific general partnership – that included all Bain Capital executives as well as others – which in turn was controlled by Bain Capital Inc., the management company that Romney had full ownership control of.[33] As CEO, Romney had the final say in every deal made.[34]

1990s

Beginning in 1989, the firm, which began as a venture capital source investing in start-up companies, adjusted its strategy to focus on leveraged buyouts and growth capital investments in more mature companies.[35] Their model was to buy existing firms with money mostly borrowed against their assets, partner with existing management to apply Bain methodology to their operations (rather than the hostile takeovers practiced in other leverage buyout scenarios), and sell them off in a few years.[18][26] Existing CEOs were offered large equity stakes in the process, owing to Bain Capital's belief in the emerging agency theory that CEOs should be bound to maximizing shareholder value rather than other goals.[19] By the end of 1990, Bain had raised $175 million of capital and financed 35 companies with combined revenues of $3.5 billion.[36]
In July 1992, Bain acquired Ampad (originally American Pad & Paper) from Mead Corporation, which had acquired the company in 1986. Mead, which had been experiencing difficulties integrating Ampad's products into its existing product lines, generated a cash gain of $56 million on the sale.[37] Under Bain's ownership, the company enjoyed a significant growth in sales from $106.7 million in 1992 to $583.9 million in 1996, when the company was listed on the New York Stock Exchange. Under Bain's ownership, the company also made a number of acquisitions, including writing products company SCM in July 1994, brand names from the American Trading and Production Corporation in August 1995, WR Acquisition and the Williamhouse-Regency Division of Delaware, Inc. in October, 1995, Niagara Envelope Company, Inc. in 1996, and Shade/Allied, Inc. in February 1997.[38] Ampad's revenue began to decline in 1997 and the company laid off employees and closed production facilities to maintain profitability. Employment declined from 4,105 in 1996 to 3,800 in 2000.[39] The company ceased trading on the New York stock exchange on December 22, 2000[40] and filed for bankruptcy in 2001. At the time of the bankruptcy, Bain Capital held a 34.9% equity ownership interest in the company.[41] The assets were acquired in 2003 by Crescent Investments. Bain's eight years' of involvement in Ampad is estimated to have generated over $100 million in profits ($60 million in dividends, $45–50 million from the proceeds from stock issued after the company went public, and $1.5-2 million in annual management fees).[42]
In 1994, Bain acquired Totes, a producer of umbrellas and overshoes.[43] Three years later, Totes, under Bain’s ownership, acquired Isotoner, a producer of leather gloves.[44]
Bain, together with Thomas H. Lee Partners, acquired Experian, the consumer credit reporting business of TRW Inc., in 1996 for more than $1 billion. Formerly known as TRW's Information Systems and Services unit, Experian is one of the leading providers of credit reports on consumers and businesses in the US.[45] The company was sold to Great Universal Stores for $1.7 billion just months after being acquired.[46] Other notable Bain investments of the late 1990s included Sealy Corporation, the manufacturer of mattresses;[47] Alliance Laundry Systems;[48] Domino's Pizza[49] and Artisan Entertainment.[50]
Much of the firm's profits was earned from a relatively small number of deals, with Bain Capital's overall success and failure rate being about even. One study of 68 deals that Bain Capital made up through the 1990s found that the firm lost money or broke even on 33 of them.[51] Another study that looked at the eight-year period following 77 deals during the same time found that in 17 cases the company went bankrupt or out of business, and in 6 cases Bain Capital lost all its investment. But 10 deals were very successful and represented 70 percent of the total profits.[52]
Romney had two diversions from Bain Capital during the first half of the decade. From January 1991 to December 1992,[26][53] Romney served as the CEO of Bain & Company where he led the successful turnaround of the consulting firm (he remained managing general partner of Bain Capital during this time).[9][10] In November 1993, he took a leave of absence for his unsuccessful 1994 run for the U.S. Senate seat from Massachusetts; he returned the day after the election in November 1994.[26][54][55] During that time, Ampad workers went on strike, and asked Romney to intervene; Bain Capital lawyers asked him not to get involved, although he did meet with the workers to tell them he had no position of active authority in the matter.[56][57]
In 1994, Bain invested in Steel Dynamics, based in Fort Wayne, Indiana, a prosperous steel company that has grown to the fifth largest in the U.S.A, employs about 6,100 people, and produces carbon steel products with 2010 revenues of $6.3 billion on steel shipments of 5.3 million tons.[58] In 1993, Bain acquired the Armco Worldwide Grinding System steel plant in Kansas City, Missouri and merged it with its steel plant in Georgetown, South Carolina to form GST Steel. The Kansas City plant had a strike in 1997 and Bain closed the plant in 2001 laying off 750 workers when it went into bankruptcy. The South Carolina plant closed in 2003 but subsequently reopened under a different owner. At the time of its bankruptcy it reported $553.9 million in debts against $395.2 in assets. Bain reported $58.4 million in profits, the employee pension fund had a liability of $44 million.[59][60][61][62]
Bain's investment in Dade Behring represented a significant investment in the medical diagnostics industry. In 1994, Bain, together with Goldman Sachs Capital Partners completed a carveout acquisition of Dade International,[63] the medical diagnostics division of Baxter International in a $440 million acquisition. Dade's private equity owners merged the company with DuPont's in vitro diagnostics business in May 1996 and subsequently with the Behring Diagnostics division of Hoechst AG in 1997.[64] Aventis, the successor of Hoechst, acquired 52% of the combined company.[65] In 1999, the company reported $1.3 billion of revenue and completed a $1.25 billion leveraged recapitalization that resulted in a payout to shareholders.[64] The dividend, taken together with other previous shareholder dividends resulted in an eightfold return on investment to Bain Capital and Goldman Sachs.[31][52] Revenues declined from 1999 through 2002 and despite attempts to cut costs through layoffs the company entered into bankruptcy in 2002. Following its restructuring, Dade Behring emerged from Bankruptcy in 2003 and continued to operate independently until 2007 when the business was acquired by Siemens Medical Solutions. Bain and Goldman lost their remaining stock in the company as part of the bankruptcy.[66]
By the end of the decade, Bain Capital was on its way to being one of the top private equity firms in the nation,[24] having increased its number of partners from 5 to 18, having 115 employees overall, and having $4 billion under its management.[15][18] The firm's average annual return on investments was 113 percent.[17][67] It had made between 100 and 150 deals where it acquired and then sold a company.[31][51][52]

1999–2002: Romney departure and political legacy

Romney took a paid leave of absence from Bain Capital in February 1999 when he became the head of the Salt Lake Organizing Committee for the 2002 Winter Olympics.[68][69] The decision caused turmoil at Bain Capital, with a power struggle ensuing.[70] Some partners left and founded the Audax Group and Golden Gate Capital.[34] Other partners threatened to leave, and there was a prospect of eight-figure lawsuits being filed.[70] Romney was worried that the firm might be destroyed, but the crisis ebbed.[70]
Romney was not involved in day-to-day operations of the firm after starting the Olympics position.[71][72] Those were handled by a management committee, consisting of five of the fourteen remaining active partners with the firm.[34] However, according to some interviews and press releases during 1999, Romney said he was keeping a part-time function at Bain.[34][73]
During his leave of absence, Romney continued to be listed in filings to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission[74] as "sole shareholder, sole director, Chief Executive Officer and President".[75][76] The SEC filings reflected the legal reality[77] and the ownership interest in the Bain Capital management company.[33][78] In practice, former Bain partners have stated that Romney's attention was mostly occupied by his Olympics position.[77][79] He did stay in regular contact with his partners, and traveled to meet with them several times, signing corporate and legal documents and paying attention to his own interests within the firm and to his departure negotiations.[78] Bain Capital Fund VI in 1998 was the last one Romney was involved in; investors were worried that with Romney gone, the firm would have trouble raising money for Bain Capital Fund VII in 2000, but in practice the $2.5 billion was raised without much trouble.[34] His former partners have said that Romney had no role in assessing other new investments after February 1999,[34] nor was he involved in directing the company’s investment funds.[33] Discussions over the final terms of Romney's departure dragged on during this time, with Romney negotiating for the best deal he could get and his continuing position as CEO and sole shareholder giving him the leverage to do so.[34][77]
Although he had left open the possibility of returning to Bain after the Olympics, Romney made his crossover to politics permanent with an announcement in August 2001.[68] His separation from the firm was finalized in early 2002.[34][80] Romney negotiated a ten-year retirement agreement with Bain Capital[34] that allowed him to receive a passive profit share and interest as a retired partner in some Bain Capital entities, including buyout and Bain Capital investment funds, in exchange for his ownership in the management company.[81][82] Because the private equity business continued to thrive, this deal would bring him millions of dollars in annual income.[82] Romney was the first and last CEO of Bain Capital; since his departure became final, it has continued to be run by management committee.[34]
Bain Capital itself, and especially its actions and investments during its first 15 years, came under press scrutiny as the result of Romney's 2008 and 2012 presidential campaigns.[31][83][84] Bain Capital made as few comments about those actions and investments as possible, as even by the standards of the private equity industry it was known for its commitment towards secrecy about itself and privacy for its clients and investors.[84] Romney's leave of absence and the level of activity he had within the firm during the 1999-2002 period also garnered attention.[85][86][87][88][89][90]

Early 2000s


In 2002, Bain acquired Burger King together with TPG Capital and Goldman Sachs Capital Partners.
Bain Capital began the new decade by closing on its seventh fund, Bain Capital Fund VII, with over $3.1 billion of investor commitments. The firm's most notable investments in 2000 included the $700 million acquisition of Datek, the online stock brokerage firm,[91] as well as the $305 million acquisition of KB Toys from Consolidated Stores.[92] Datek was ultimately merged with Ameritrade in 2002. KB Toys, which had been financially troubled since the 1990s as a result of increased pressure from national discount chains such as Wal-Mart and Target, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in January 2004. Bain had been able to recover value on its investment through a dividend recapitalization in 2003.[93] In early 2001, Bain agreed to purchase a 30 percent stake, worth $600 million, in Huntsman Corporation, a leading chemical company owned by Jon Huntsman, Sr., but the deal was never completed.[94][95]
With a significant amount of committed capital in its new fund available for investment, Bain was one of a handful of private equity investors capable of completing large transactions in the adverse conditions of the early 2000s recession. In July 2002, Bain together with TPG Capital and Goldman Sachs Capital Partners, announced the high profile $2.3 billion leveraged buyout of Burger King from Diageo.[96] However, in November the original transaction collapsed, when Burger King failed to meet certain performance targets. In December 2002, Bain and its co-investors agreed on a reduced $1.5 billion purchase price for the investment.[97] The Bain consortium had support from Burger King's franchisees, who controlled approximately 92% of Burger King restaurants at the time of the transaction. Under its new owners, Burger King underwent a major brand overhaul including the use of The Burger King character in advertising. In February 2006, Burger King announced plans for an initial public offering.[98]
In late 2002, Bain remained active acquiring Houghton Mifflin Company for $1.28 billion, together with Thomas H. Lee Partners and The Blackstone Group. Houghton Mifflin and Burger King represented two of the first large club deals, completed since the collapse of the Dot-com bubble.[99]
In November 2003, Bain completed an investment in Warner Music Group. In 2004 Bain acquired the Dollarama chain of dollar stores, based in Montreal, Quebec, Canada and operating stores in the provinces of Eastern Canada for $1.05 billion CAD. In March 2004, Bain acquired Brenntag Group from Deutsche Bahn AG (Exited in 2006; sold to BC Partners for $4B). In August 2003, Bain acquired a 50% interest in Bombardier Inc.'s recreational products division, along with the Bombardier family and the Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec, and created Bombardier Recreational Products or BRP.

Bain and the 2000s buy-out boom


Bain led a consortium in the buyout of Toys "R" Us in 2004
In 2004 a consortium comprising KKR, Bain Capital and real estate development company Vornado Realty Trust announced the $6.6 billion acquisition of Toys "R" Us, the toy retailer. A month earlier, Cerberus Capital Management, made a $5.5 billion offer for both the toy and baby supplies businesses.[100] The Toys 'R' Us buyout was one of the largest in several years.[101] Following this transaction, by the end of 2004 and in 2005, major buyouts were once again becoming common and market observers were stunned by the leverage levels and financing terms obtained by financial sponsors in their buyouts.[102]
The following year, in 2005, Bain was one of seven private equity firms involved in the buyout of SunGard in a transaction valued at $11.3 billion. Bain's partners in the acquisition were Silver Lake Partners, TPG Capital, Goldman Sachs Capital Partners, Kohlberg Kravis Roberts, Providence Equity Partners, and The Blackstone Group. This represented the largest leveraged buyout completed since the takeover of RJR Nabisco at the end of the 1980s leveraged buyout boom. Also, at the time of its announcement, SunGard would be the largest buyout of a technology company in history, a distinction it would cede to the buyout of Freescale Semiconductor. The SunGard transaction is also notable in the number of firms involved in the transaction, the largest club deal completed to that point. The involvement of seven firms in the consortium was criticized by investors in private equity who considered cross-holdings among firms to be generally unattractive.[103][104]

Bain led the buyout of Dunkin' Brands for $2.4 billion in 2005
Bain led a consortium, together with The Carlyle Group and Thomas H. Lee Partners to acquire Dunkin' Brands. The private equity firms paid $2.425 billion in cash for the parent company of Dunkin' Donuts and Baskin-Robbins in December 2005.[105]
In 2006, Bain Capital and Kohlberg Kravis Roberts, together with Merrill Lynch and the Frist family (which had founded the company) completed a $31.6 billion acquisition of Hospital Corporation of America, 17 years after it was taken private for the first time in a management buyout. At the time of its announcement, the HCA buyout would be the first of several to set new records for the largest buyout, eclipsing the 1989 buyout of RJR Nabisco. It would later be surpassed by the buyouts of Equity Office Properties and TXU.[106] In August 2006, Bain was part of the consortium, together with Kohlberg Kravis Roberts, Silver Lake Partners and AlpInvest Partners, that acquired a controlling 80.1% share of semiconductors unit of Philips for €6.4 billion. The new company, based in the Netherlands, was renamed NXP Semiconductors.[107][108]
During the buyout boom, Bain was active in the acquisition of various retail businesses.[109] In January 2006, Bain announced the acquisition of Burlington Coat Factory, a discount retailer operating 367 department stores in 42 states, in a $2 billion buyout transaction.[110] Six months later, in October 2006, Bain and The Blackstone Group acquired Michaels Stores, the largest arts and crafts retailer in North America in a $6.0 billion leveraged buyout. Bain and Blackstone narrowly beat out Kohlberg Kravis Roberts and TPG Capital in an auction for the company.[111] In June 2007, Bain agreed to acquire HD Supply, the wholesale construction supply business of Home Depot for $10.3 billion.[112] Bain, along with partners Carlyle Group and Clayton, Dubilier & Rice, would later negotiate a lower price ($8.5 billion) when the initial stages of the subprime mortgage crisis caused lenders to seek to renegotiate the terms of the acquisition financing.[113] Just days after the announcement of the HD Supply deal, on June 27, Bain announced the acquisition of Guitar Center, the leading musical equipment retailer in the U.S. Bain paid $1.9 billion, plus $200 million in assumed debt, representing a 26% premium to the stock's closing price prior to the announcement.[114] Bain also acquired Edcon Limited, which operates Edgars Department Stores in South Africa and Zimbabwe for 25 billion-rand ($3.5 billion) in February 2007.[115]
Other investments during the buyout boom included: Bavaria Yachtbau, acquired for €1.3 billion in July 2007[116] as well as Sensata Technologies, acquired from Texas Instruments in 2006 for approximately $3 billion.[117]

Since 2008

In the wake of the closure of the credit markets in 2007 and 2008, Bain managed to close only a small number of sizable transactions. In July 2008, Bain, together with NBC Universal and The Blackstone Group agreed to purchase The Weather Channel from Landmark Communications.[118][119]
Subsequent investments include, but are not limited to:

Businesses and affiliates

Bain Capital's family of funds includes private equity, venture capital, public equity, and leveraged debt assets.

Bain Capital Private Equity

Bain Capital Private Equity has raised ten funds and invested in more than 250 companies. The private equity activity includes leveraged buyouts and growth capital in a wide variety of industries.[129] Bain began investing in Europe in 1989 through its London-based affiliate Bain Capital Europe.[130] Bain also operates international affiliates Bain Capital Asia and Bain Capital India.
Bain Capital Private Equity is made up of more than 250 investment professionals, including 38 managing directors operating from offices in Boston, Hong Kong, London, Mumbai, Munich, New York, Shanghai, and Tokyo, as of the beginning of 2011.
Historically, Bain has primarily relied on private equity funds, pools of committed capital from pension funds, insurance companies, endowments, fund of funds, high net worth individuals, sovereign wealth funds and other institutional investors. Bain's own investment professionals are the largest single investor in each of its funds. From 1993, when Bain raised its first institutional fund through the beginning of 2012, Bain had completed fundraising for 11 funds with total investor commitments of over $38 billion, including its global private equity funds and separate funds focusing specifically on investments in Europe and Asia. Since 1998, each of Bain's global funds has invested alongside a coinvestment fund that invests only in certain larger transactions. The following is a summary of Bain's private equity funds raised from its inception through the beginning of 2012:[131]
Fund Vintage
Year
Committed
Capital ($m)
Bain Capital Fund IV 1993 $300
Bain Capital Fund V 1995 $500
Bain Capital Fund VI 1998 $1,400[132]
Bain Capital Fund VII 2000 $3,117[132]
Bain Capital Fund VIII 2004 $4,250[132]
Bain Capital Fund VIII-E (Europe) 2004 $1,015
Bain Capital Fund IX 2006 $10,000[132]
Bain Capital Europe III 2008 € 3,500
Bain Capital Asia 2008 $1,000
Bain Capital Fund X 2008 $11,800[132]
Bain Capital Asia II 2011 $2,000

Bain Capital Ventures

Bain Capital Ventures is the venture capital arm of Bain Capital, focused on seed through late-stage growth equity, investing in business services, consumer, healthcare, internet & mobile, and software companies. Bain Capital Ventures has raised approximately $1.53 billion of investor capital since 2001 across four investment funds. The firm's 30 investment professionals are currently investing its fourth fund, Bain Capital Venture Fund 2009, which raised $525 million from investors.[133]
The following is a summary of Bain's private equity funds raised from its inception through the beginning of 2012:[131]
Fund Vintage
Year
Committed
Capital ($m)
Bain Capital Venture Fund 2001 $250
Bain Capital Venture Partners 2005 2005 $250
Bain Capital Venture Partners 2007 2007 $500
Bain Capital Venture Partners 2009 2009 $525
Bain Capital Venture Partners 2012 2012 $600[134]
Since 2001, Bain Capital Ventures' most notable investments include DoubleClick, LinkedIn,[135] Shopping.com, Taleo Corporation, MinuteClinic and SurveyMonkey.[136]

Brookside Capital

Brookside Capital is the public equity affiliate of Bain Capital. Established in October 1996, Brookside's primary objective is to invest in securities of publicly traded companies that offer opportunities to realize substantial long-term capital appreciation. Brookside employs a long/short equity strategy to reduce market risk in the portfolio[137]

Sankaty Advisors

Sankaty Advisors, the fixed income affiliate of Bain Capital, is one of the nation's leading private managers of high yield debt securities. With $15.7 billion of assets under management, Sankaty invests in a wide variety of securities, including leveraged loans, high-yield bonds, distressed securities, mezzanine debt, convertible bonds, structured products and equity investments. Sankaty has approximately 140 employees, including 80 investment professionals across offices in Boston, Chicago, New York and London.[138]

Absolute Return Capital

Absolute Return Capital (ARC) is the absolute return affiliate of Bain Capital managing approximately $1.2 billion of capital. Approximately one-third of the capital managed by ARC represents commitments from Bain investment professionals. Established in May 2004, ARC invests across fixed income, equity and commodity markets to produce attractive risk-adjusted returns while maintaining low correlation to traditional investments.[139]

Appraisals and critiques

Bain Capital's approach of applying consulting expertise to the companies it invested in became widely copied within the private equity industry.[15][140] University of Chicago Booth School of Business economist Steven Kaplan said in 2011 that the firm "came up with a model that was very successful and very innovative and that now everybody uses."[19]
In his 2009 book The Buyout of America: How Private Equity Is Destroying Jobs and Killing the American Economy, Josh Kosman described Bain Capital as "notorious for its failure to plow profits back into its businesses," being the first large private-equity firm to derive a large fraction of its revenues from corporate dividends and other distributions. The revenue potential of this strategy, which may "starve" a company of capital,[141] was increased by a 1970s court ruling that allowed companies to consider the entire fair-market value of the company, instead of only their "hard assets", in determining how much money was available to pay dividends.[142] In at least some instances, companies acquired by Bain borrowed money in order to increase their dividend payments, ultimately leading to the collapse of what had been financially stable businesses.[55]

Investments gallery

Selected Bain Capital investments
Sports Authority
(invested 1987) 
Guitar Center
(acquired June 2006) 
Hospital Corporation of America
(acquired July 2006) 
Gymboree
(acquired October 2010) 
Clear Channel Communications
(acquired July 2008) 
Houghton Mifflin
(acquired December 2002) 
Staples, Inc.
(invested 1986) 
D&M Holdings
(acquired July 2008) 
Domino's Pizza
(acquired September 1998) 
The Weather Channel
(invested September 2008) 
Burger King
(acquired December 2002) 
Sealy Corporation
(acquired November 1997) 
Brookstone
(acquired 1991) 
Burlington Coat Factory
(acquired January 2006) 
Dunkin' Donuts
(acquired December 2005) 
Steel Dynamics (invested 1994) 

References

  1. ^ [1]. William H. Bain Bio.
  2. ^ a b "Team" (website), Bain Capital, retrieved January 4, 2012
  3. ^ Bain Capital will move to Hancock Tower. Boston.com, May 11, 2010
  4. ^ Knickerbocker, Brad (June 23, 2012). "Why is Mitt Romney's time at Bain Capital such a target?". The Christian Science Monitor.
  5. ^ Fifield, Anna; McGregor, Richard (September 21, 2012). "Romney releases tax return detail". Financial Times.(subscription required)
  6. ^ Pappu, Sridhar (September 2005). "The Holy Cow! Candidate". The Atlantic Monthly.
  7. ^ Bain & Company Profile. Funding Universe, 2000
  8. ^ McKibben, Gordon (October 30, 1990). "Bain & Co. plans major layoffs, Boston staff hardest hit". The Boston Globe.(subscription required)
  9. ^ a b Lewis, Diane E. (January 30, 1991). "Bain agrees to reshape ownership". The Boston Globe.(subscription required)
  10. ^ a b Fabrikant, Geraldine (January 30, 1991). "Bain Names Chief Executive And Begins a Reorganization". The New York Times.
  11. ^ Horowitz, Alan S. (February 1, 1992). "Venture capital primer". Utah Business.
  12. ^ Romney, Mitt (June 21, 1998). "Dad's ideas live on – and in others". The Boston Globe.
  13. ^ Nyhan, David (May 28, 1995). "They're trying to sell volunteerism up the river". The Boston Globe.(subscription required)
  14. ^ Romney, Turnaround, pp. 15–16.
  15. ^ a b c d e Blum, Justin; Lerer, Lisa (July 20, 2011). "Romney's Record Defies Image as Job-Creator". Bloomberg News.
  16. ^ Kranish; Helman, The Real Romney, p. 134.
  17. ^ a b Rees, Matthew (December 1, 2006). "Mister PowerPoint Goes to Washington". The American.
  18. ^ a b c d Kirkpatrick, David D. (June 4, 2007). "Romney's Fortunes Tied to Business Riches". The New York Times.
  19. ^ a b c d Wallace-Wells, Benjamin (October 23, 2011). "Mitt Romney and the 1% Economy". New York.
  20. ^ a b Tanfani, Joseph; Melanie Mason, Matea Gold (July 19, 2012). "Bain Capital started with help of offshore investors". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved July 21, 2012.
  21. ^ Elliot, Justin (January 20, 2012). "The roots of Bain Capital in El Salvador’s civil war". Salon. Retrieved July 21, 2012.
  22. ^ Kranish; Helman, The Real Romney, p. 133.
  23. ^ Big Consultants Woo Employees by Offering a Piece of the Action. New York Times, October 22, 1999
  24. ^ a b Sorkin, Andrew Ross (June 4, 2007). "Romney's Presidential Run Puts Spotlight on Bain Capital". The New York Times.
  25. ^ Kranish; Helman, The Real Romney, p. 138.
  26. ^ a b c d e f Gavin, Robert; Pfeiffer, Sacha (June 26, 2007). "The Making of Mitt Romney: Part 3: Reaping profit in study, sweat". The Boston Globe.
  27. ^ "Growth in Office-Supply 'Supermarkets' Threatens Tough War for Market Share". Wall Street Journal, December 1, 1988
  28. ^ Staples Inc. Plans to Go Public. The Boston Globe, March 22, 1989
  29. ^ Staples Inc. Company Profile. Funding Universe, 2002
  30. ^ Securities & Exchange Commission: January 2012 10-K for Staples Inc retrieved October 28, 2012
  31. ^ a b c d e Barbaro, Michael (November 13, 2011). "After a Romney Deal, Profits and Then Layoffs". The New York Times. p. A1.
  32. ^ Counselor To The King. New York Times, September 24, 1989
  33. ^ a b c Confessore, Nicholas; Shear, Michael D. (July 16, 2012). "When Did Romney Step Back From Bain? It's Complicated, Filings Suggest". The New York Times. p. A10.
  34. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Healy, Beth; Kranish, Michael (July 20, 2012). "Romney kept reins, bargained hard on severance". The Boston Globe.
  35. ^ "Venture-Capital Funds Grow Larger and Larger - But Start-Up Companies Find They're Still Left Out in the Cold". The Wall Street Journal, September 7, 1989
  36. ^ Bain Names Chief Executive And Begins a Reorganization. New York Times, January 30, 1991
  37. ^ Mead Corp. to Lay Off 1,000. New York Times, July 3, 1992
  38. ^ "American Pad & Paper Company Profile". Answers.com. Retrieved 2012-02-11.
  39. ^ Deseret News: 30 companies Mitt Romney's Bain Capital invested in from 1986-1998 - "American Pad & Paper" By Jackie Hicken June 17, 2012
  40. ^ SEC.gov: 8-K filing December 21, 2000
  41. ^ SEC.gov Fiscal year end December 31, 1999 10-K for American Pad & Paper Company retrieved October 28, 2012
  42. ^ James Abundis and Robert Gavin, "Ampad: A controversial deal", The Boston Globe, retrieved January 4, 2012
  43. ^ Totes is Bought By Boston Investment Firm. New York Times, June 28, 1994
  44. ^ Totes To Buy A Majority Interest In Aris Isotoner. New York Times, June 6, 1997
  45. ^ TRW Credit Reporting Unit To Be Sold for $1 Billion. Bloomberg Business News, February 10, 1996
  46. ^ Large British Retailer to Buy U.S. Credit-Data Company. New York Times, November 15, 1996
  47. ^ Sealy to be Sold to Management and an Investor Group. New York Times, November 4, 1997
  48. ^ Raytheon in $358 million Deal to Sell Laundry Business. New York Times, February 24, 1998
  49. ^ Domino's Pizza Founder To Retire And Sell A Stake. New York Times, September 26, 1998
  50. ^ Playing Movies Like a Growth Stock. New York Times, December 21, 1998
  51. ^ a b Kranish, Michael; Helman, Scott (February 2012). "The Meaning of Mitt". Vanity Fair.
  52. ^ a b c Maremont, Mark (January 9, 2012). "Romney at Bain: Big Gains, Some Busts". The Wall Street Journal.
  53. ^ Fabrikant, Geraldine (January 30, 1991). "Bain Names Chief Executive And Begins a Reorganization". The New York Times.
  54. ^ Phillips, Frank (October 8, 1994). "Romney agrees to talk; union balks". The Boston Globe.
  55. ^ a b Yang, Jia Lynn (December 14, 2011), "Mitt Romney’s Bain Capital tenure shows mixed record on bankruptcies", Washington Post
  56. ^ Vaillancourt, Meg (October 10, 1994). "Romney meets with strikers Ind. workers say nothing resolved". The Boston Globe.
  57. ^ Phillips, Frank (January 5, 1995). "Strike-bound factory tied to Romney during US Senate race is set to close". The Boston Globe.
  58. ^ Hoover, Ken (January 13, 2012).Mitt Romney-Led Bain Funded Steel Dynamics' Success. Investors Business Daily
  59. ^ Helling, Dave (2012-01-06). "Bain Capital tied to bankruptcy, closing of KC steel plant". KansasCity.com. Retrieved 2012-02-01.
  60. ^ David Wren. "Romney's Bain made millions as S.C. steelmaker went bankrupt". KansasCity.com. Retrieved 2012-02-01.
  61. ^ "Missouri Valley Special Collections : Item Viewer". Kchistory.org. 2001-02-08. Retrieved 2012-02-01.
  62. ^ Sullivan, Andy (January 6, 2012). "Special report: Romney's steel skeleton in the Bain closet". Reuters. Retrieved 2012-02-01.
  63. ^ fundinguniverse.com Dade Behring company history. Funding Universe
  64. ^ a b Dade Behring Form 10K 1999 Annual Report. Securities and Exchange Commission, Filed March 30, 2000
  65. ^ Aventis May Sell Controlling Stake in Dade Behring. New York Times, December 20, 2000
  66. ^ Dade Behring Registration Statement. Securities and Exchange Commission, April 11, 2003
  67. ^ Farragher, Thomas; Nelson, Scott Bernard (October 24, 2002). "Business record helps, hinders Romney". The Boston Globe. p. A1.(subscription required)
  68. ^ a b Roche, Lisa Riley; Bernick Jr., Bob (August 20, 2001). "Public service for Romney". Deseret News.
  69. ^ Glenn Kessler (July 12, 2012). "Mitt Romney and his departure from Bain" (blog by expert). The Washington Post. Retrieved July 14, 2012.
  70. ^ a b c Kranish; Helman, The Real Romney, pp. 206–207.
  71. ^ "Is Romney to Blame for Cancer Death?". FactCheck. August 8, 2012.
  72. ^ Callum Borchers (July 16, 2012). "Mitt Romney and backers use ‘day-to-day’ to reshape questions about Bain". The Boston Globe. Retrieved August 13, 2012.
  73. ^ Mitt Romney, quoted by the Boston Herald in February 1999 (Greg Gatlin, “Romney Looks To Restore Olympic Pride,” The Boston Herald, February 12, 1999)
  74. ^ Bain Capital Fund VI, L.P. (February 20, 2001). "SCHEDULE 13D (Rule 13d-101)". Securities and Exchange Commission. Retrieved July 14, 2012. "Bain Capital, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Bain Capital"), is the sole managing partner of the BCIP entities. Mr. W. Mitt Romney is the sole shareholder, sole director, Chief Executive Officer and President of Bain Capital and thus is the controlling person of Bain Capital."
  75. ^ Marshall, John. "No, Romney Didn’t Leave Bain in 1999". Retrieved 11 July 2012.
  76. ^ Borchers, Callum. "Mitt Romney stayed at Bain 3 years longer than he stated". Christopher M. Mayer. Retrieved 12 July 2012.
  77. ^ a b c Gentile, Sal (July 15, 2012). "Former Bain Capital partner says Romney was 'legally' CEO of Bain Capital until 2002". msnbc.com.
  78. ^ a b Braun, Stephen; Gillum, Jack (July 25, 2012). "Fact Check: Romney Met Bain Partners After Exit". Associated Press.
  79. ^ King, John. "John King: Why is 1999 so important in 2012?". CNN. Retrieved 12 July 2012.
  80. ^ Charles, Deborah (July 12, 2012). "Romney faces new questions over tenure at Bain". Chicago Tribune. Reuters.
  81. ^ Kuhnhenn, Jim (August 14, 2007). "Romney Worth As Much As $250 Million". The Washington Post. Associated Press.
  82. ^ a b Confessore, Nicholas; Drew, Christopher; Creswell, Julie (December 18, 2011). "Buyout Profits Keep Flowing to Romney". The New York Times.
  83. ^ Hicks, Josh (November 2, 2011). "Romney’s claims about Bain Capital job creation". The Washington Post.
  84. ^ a b Hagey, Keach (January 11, 2012). "Mitt Romney’s Bain Capital days: A black box". Politico.
  85. ^ Callum Borchers; Christopher Rowland (July 12, 2012). "Mitt Romney stayed at Bain 3 years longer than he stated: Firm’s 2002 filings identify him as CEO, though he said he left in 1999". The Boston Globe. Retrieved July 14, 2012.
  86. ^ King, John. "John King: Why is 1999 so important in 2012?". CNN. Retrieved 12 July 2012.
  87. ^ Glenn Kessler (July 13, 2012). "Do Bain SEC documents suggest Mitt Romney is a criminal?" (blog by expert). The Washington Post. Retrieved July 14, 2012.
  88. ^ Michael D. Shear (July 13, 2012). "Romney Seeks Obama Apology for Bain Attacks". The New York Times. Retrieved July 14, 2012.
  89. ^ "Mitt Romney's Own 2002 Testimony Undermines Bain Departure Claim". Huffington Post. July 12, 2012. Retrieved July 14, 2012. "[Statement by Bain] "Mitt Romney left Bain Capital in February 1999 to run the Olympics and has had absolutely no involvement with the management or investment activities of the firm or with any of its portfolio companies since the day of his departure," the statement reads. "Due to the sudden nature of Mr. Romney's departure, he remained the sole stockholder for a time while formal ownership was being documented and transferred to the group of partners who took over management of the firm in 1999. Accordingly, Mr. Romney was reported in various capacities on SEC filings during this period.""
  90. ^ Elspeth Reeve (July 12, 2012). "Why Romney's Quit Date at Bain Matters". Atlantic Wire. Retrieved July 14, 2012.
  91. ^ Group to Buy Controlling Interest in Datek Online for $700 Million. New York Times, December 02, 2000
  92. ^ Bain Capital Buys Toys Unit of Consolidated Stores. New York Times, December 09, 2000
  93. ^ Buyout Profits Keep Flowing to Romney. New York Times, December 18, 2011
  94. ^ Bain Capital Buys Stake In Huntsman, Chemical Company. New York Times, February 24, 2001
  95. ^ Huntsman, Bain Capital dealing: Huntsman offering $600 million equity stake to venture firm. Deseret News, Feb. 24, 2001
  96. ^ U.S. Investors Agree to Buy Burger King From Diageo for $2.26 Billion. New York Times, July 26, 2002
  97. ^ A Lower Price Is Said to Revive Burger King Sale, New York Times, December 12, 2002
  98. ^ Grace Wong (2006-05-12). "Burger King IPO set to fire up". CNN Money. Retrieved 2007-09-30.
  99. ^ Vivendi Finishes Sale of Houghton Mifflin To Investors. New York Times, January 1, 2003
  100. ^ Sorkin, Andrew Ross and Rozhon, Tracie. "Three Firms Are Said to Buy Toys 'R' Us for $6 Billion." New York Times, March 17, 2005
  101. ^ What's Next for Toys 'R' Us?. Wall Street Journal, March 18, 2005
  102. ^ Deal Mania: Shades of the '80s: The leveraged buyout is back in vogue. US News & World Report, April 10, 2005
  103. ^ "Capital Firms Agree to Buy SunGard Data in Cash Deal." Bloomberg L.P., March 29, 2005
  104. ^ Do Too Many Cooks Spoil the Takeover Deal?. New York Times, April 3, 2005
  105. ^ Parent of Dunkin' Donuts Sold For $2.4 Billion to Equity Firms (New York Times, 2005
  106. ^ Sorkin, Andrew Ross. "HCA Buyout Highlights Era of Going Private." New York Times, July 25, 2006
  107. ^ Bloomberg News (2006-08-04). "Technology; Royal Philips Sells Unit for $4.4 Billion". New York Times. Retrieved 2008-04-27.
  108. ^ KKR in deal to buy Philips Semiconductors. Forbes, August 2, 2006
  109. ^ Bain Adds Guitar Center To Its Lineup. Forbes, June 27, 2007
  110. ^ Bain to Buy Burlington Coat Factory. The Street.com, January 18, 2006
  111. ^ Consortium Buys Michaels for $6 Billion. New York Times, July 1, 2006
  112. ^ Zimmerman, Ann; Berman, Dennis K. (June 20, 2007). "Home Depot Boosts Buyback, Sets Unit Sale". The Wall Street Journal.
  113. ^ Private Equity's White-Knuckle Deal. Business Week, September 17, 2007
  114. ^ Bain Plucks Up Guitar Center, The Street, June 27, 2007
  115. ^ Bain Capital Agrees to Buy Edgars for 25 Billion Rand. Bloomberg, February 8, 2007]
  116. ^ Bavaria set to Boom with Bain. Sail World, July 1, 2007
  117. ^ Bain cheers return on Sensata float. Financial News, March 12, 2010
  118. ^ Robert Marich. "The Weather Channel Sale Wraps". Broadcasting & Cable. Archived from the original on 15 September 2008. Retrieved 2008-09-26.
  119. ^ Michael J. de la Merced (July 7, 2008). "Weather Channel Is Sold to NBC and Equity Firms". New York Times. Retrieved 2008-09-17.
  120. ^ "Bain acquires Clear Channel Communications". Reuters.[dead link]
  121. ^ "D&M Saga Finally Ends With Bain Capital Deal - 2008-07-07 06:00:00". TWICE. Retrieved 2012-02-11.
  122. ^ Barboza, David (June 22, 2009). "Bain Capital to Invest in Chinese Retailer". The New York Times.
  123. ^ Bain Capital pays $1.6 billion for Dow division, Mass High Tech, March 2, 2010
  124. ^ Dagher, Veronica; Holmes, Elizabeth (October 12, 2010). "Bain Pays .8 Billion for Gymboree". The Wall Street Journal.
  125. ^ Physio-Control's sale to Bain completed, The Seattle Times, January 30, 2012
  126. ^ "Genpact Announces Agreement for Bain Capital Partners to Buy $1 Billion of Shares from Existing Sponsors". Retrieved 2013-07-08.
  127. ^ "Deals of the day – mergers and acquisitions". Reuters. October 10, 2012.
  128. ^ "BMC Software Signs Definitive Agreement to be Acquired for $46.25 per Share in Cash". Retrieved 2013-07-08.
  129. ^ Bain Capital Private Equity (company website)
  130. ^ Bain Capital Europe (company website)
  131. ^ a b Data collected from Preqin, a private equity database system
  132. ^ a b c d e Includes coinvestment funds for Bain Capital Fund VI ($300m), Bain Capital Fund VII ($617m), Bain Capital Fund VIII ($750m), Bain Capital Fund IX ($2 billion) and Bain Capital Fund X ($1.8 billion), each raised alongside the main funds
  133. ^ Bain Capital Ventures (company website)
  134. ^ Rusli, Evelyn M. (2012-01-30). "Bain Capital Ventures Raises $600 Million Fund". Dealbook.nytimes.com. Retrieved 2012-02-11.
  135. ^ Tuesday, June 17th, 2008 (2012-01-31). "LinkedIn Closes Its Round; Got That Billion Dollar Valuation". Techcrunch.com. Retrieved 2012-02-11.
  136. ^ Business Wire (2009-04-20). "SurveyMonkey Announces Group Led by Spectrum Equity to Become Majority Investor". Businesswire.com. Retrieved 2012-02-11.
  137. ^ Brookside Capital (company website)
  138. ^ Sankaty Advisors (company website)
  139. ^ Absolute Return Capital (company website)
  140. ^ Vickers, Marcia (June 27, 2007). "The Republicans' Mr. Fix-it". Fortune.
  141. ^ Kosman, The Buyout of America, p. 106.
  142. ^ Kosman, The Buyout of America, p. 118.

Bibliography

External links

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bain_Capital
ETHICAL DONATORS AND COMMUNITY MEMBERS REQUIRED, TO FILL THIS SPACE WITH YOUR POLITICAL SLOGANS, ADVERTISING OFFERS, WEBSITE DETAILS, CHARITY REQUESTS, LECTURE OPPORTUNITIES, EDUCATIONAL WORKSHOPS, SPIRITUAL AND/ORHEALTH ENLIGHTENMENT COURSES.
AS AN IMPORTANT MEMBER OF THE GLOBAL INDEPENDENT MEDIA COMMUNITY, MIKIVERSE BANKS HONOURABLY REQUESTS YOUR HELP TO KEEP YOUR NEWSDIVERSE,AND FREE OF CORPORATE, GOVERNMENT SPIN AND CONTROL. FOR MORE INFO ON HOW YOU MAY ASSIST, PLEASE CONTACT: themikiverse@gmail.com